Contact Us | Site Map | SEARCH
 
About HDNEvolution of TreatmentRh-SensitizationAbout RhophylacThe Rhophylac PromiseProfessional ResourcesOrdering and ReimbursementPatient EducationRequest More InformationImportant Safety InformationPrescribing Information
Rhophylac has you covered


Evolution of Preventive Treatment

Although no laboratory tests were available to prove their suspicions, historians have postulated that in the early 1500s the wife of Henry VIII, Catherine of Aragon's pregnancy history was consistent with RH Disease or HDN. She had five babies who were either stillborn or died early in the newborn period.

Hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) was identified in 1939 by Dr. Phillip Levine. Dr. Levine was treating a woman named Mary Sano, whose second pregnancy resulted in a stillborn baby. Afterward, this same woman had a reaction from a transfusion in which she received her husband's blood. Doctors began to understand that her husband and baby had certain antigens in their blood that were not present on the mother's, and further, that she had formed antibodies against their antigens. Ultimately, the blood group antigen was understood to be the Rhesus factor. The concept of Rh-sensitization also began to be examined.

In the 1940s, approximately 10% of all pregnancies in the United States were affected by HDN. At that time, the only preventive therapy was exchange transfusions. These massive transfusions involved total replacement of the baby's blood immediately after birth.

By the mid-1940s, an Rh-positive baby born to an Rh-negative mother had a 1 in 30 chance of developing HDN. Approximately 10,000 babies were affected by HDN each year—half of those were fatal cases. By 1968, about 10,000 babies died as a result of HDN.

In the 1960s, scientists proposed giving Rh-negative pregnant mothers a simple injection of antibodies just after delivery. Within 1 year, 500,000 pregnant women had received the injection. By 1973, it was estimated that 50,000 lives had been saved.

Because of anti-D treatment, the incidence of an Rh-negative pregnant woman becoming sensitized today is approximately 0.1%.

HDN Prevention: A Timeline

Europe

1967 - In June, the Swiss Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service in Zürich commences collection of plasma from 27 Rh-immunized female patients. The plasma was sent to the German Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service in Baden-Baden, Germany, for manufacture. The product was successfully tested in 100 patients, and thereafter, Rh-prophylaxis was introduced in Switzerland. Switzerland is the first country in the world to provide anti-D to all mothers at risk.

1969 - ZLB (Swiss Red Cross) started the production of its commercially available anti-D product for the Swiss market.

Australia

1966 - Following the 1966 Congress of the ISBT (International Society Blood Transfusion), at which there was a roundtable held on The Prevention of Rh Haemolytic Disease, CSL Limited and the Red Cross set up a program to collect anti-D plasma from donors with high-titre antibodies.

1967 - The first doses of anti-D were prepared by CSL in February and national distribution commenced in August. Australia is the second country in the world to provide anti-D to all mothers at risk.

United States

1960 - Three scientists open Rh Antepartum Clinic at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center to test their theories for Rh alloimmunization to prevent HDN, a disease that claimed roughly 10,000 infant lives annually.

1961-1962 - They began their first tests on 9 Rh-negative men at Sing Sing Prison.

1965 - They successfully tested 27 additional volunteers.

1966 - First study with pregnant women, RhoGAM® was used successfully in 160 women.

1968 - RhoGAM® used cold ethanol fractionation process to isolate human immune globulins from pooled blood. RhoGAM® became the standard therapy for HDN.

RhoGAM is a registered trademark of Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.


Important Safety Information

Rhophylac® is indicated for suppression of rhesus (Rh) isoimmunization in:

  • Pregnancy and obstetric conditions in non-sensitized, Rho(D)-negative women with an Rh-incompatible pregnancy, including routine antepartum and postpartum Rh prophylaxis and Rh prophylaxis in cases of obstetric complications, invasive procedures during pregnancy, or obstetric manipulative procedures.
  • Incompatible transfusions in Rho(D)-negative individuals transfused with blood components containing Rho(D)-positive red blood cells.

For suppression of Rh isoimmunization, Rhophylac® can be administered IM or IV.

Rhophylac® is indicated to raise platelet counts in Rho(D)-positive, non-splenectomized adult patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). For the treatment of ITP, Rhophylac® must be administered IV.

Rhophylac® is contraindicated in individuals with known anaphylactic or severe systemic reaction to human immune globulin products.

Allergic or hypersensitivity reactions may occur with Rhophylac®; early signs of hypersensitivity include generalized urticaria, chest tightness, wheezing, hypotension, and anaphylaxis. Individuals with selective IgA deficiency can develop antibodies to IgA and may develop severe hypersensitivity and anaphylactic reactions. For these individuals, weigh the expected benefits of treatment against the potential risks.

Rhophylac® is derived from human plasma. The risk of transmission of infectious agents, including viruses and, theoretically, the Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) agent, cannot be completely eliminated.

Suppression of Rh Isoimmunization: For postpartum use following an Rh-incompatible pregnancy, Rhophylac® should not be given to the newborn infant.

The most common adverse reactions in the suppression of Rh isoimmunization with Rhophylac® are nausea, dizziness, headache, injection-site pain, and malaise.

Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura: The most serious adverse reactions in patients receiving Rho(D) immune globulin have been observed in the treatment of ITP. ITP patients being treated with Rhophylac® should be monitored for signs and symptoms of intravascular hemolysis, including back pain, shaking chills, fever, and hemoglobinuria. Potentially serious complications of intravascular hemolysis include clinically compromising anemia, acute renal insufficiency, and, very rarely, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and death.

The most common adverse reactions observed in the treatment of ITP are chills, pyrexia/increased body temperature, and headache. Mild extravascular hemolysis has also been observed. In patients with preexisting anemia, weigh the benefits of Rhophylac® against the potential risk of increasing the severity of the anemia.

Please see full prescribing information.

You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088.